Recall Score Discrepancy with Manual Calculation using Confusion Matrix

What will you learn?

In this tutorial, you will delve into the reasons behind discrepancies in recall score calculations when done manually compared to using the confusion_matrix function in Python. By understanding these differences, you will be able to ensure accurate evaluation of your machine learning model’s performance.

Introduction to the Problem and Solution

When evaluating machine learning models, discrepancies may arise between manual calculations of performance metrics like recall score and those obtained from built-in functions such as confusion_matrix. These variations can stem from differences in calculation methodologies or data handling techniques. To address this issue effectively, it is essential to compare how recall scores are computed through manual methods versus utilizing the confusion_matrix function.

To resolve this discrepancy, we will walk through a step-by-step comparison of both approaches. By doing so, we aim to identify the underlying reasons for any observed disparities and gain insights into optimizing model evaluation processes.


# Import necessary libraries
import numpy as np
from sklearn.metrics import confusion_matrix

# Generate sample data for demonstration purposes (actual values vs. predicted values)
actual = np.array([1, 0, 1, 1, 0])
predicted = np.array([1, 1, 1, 0, 0])

# Calculate True Positives (TP), False Negatives (FN) using confusion matrix
tn, fp, fn, tp = confusion_matrix(actual,predicted).ravel()

# Manually calculate Recall Score 
recall_manual = tp / (tp + fn)

print("Recall Score - Manual Calculation:", recall_manual)

# Copyright PHD

*Note: For more Python programming resources visit


The code snippet provided illustrates how to compute the recall score both manually and through a confusion matrix. Here’s a breakdown of each step:

  • Importing Libraries: Necessary libraries like numpy and sklearn.metrics are imported.
  • Generating Sample Data: Actual and predicted values are created for comparison.
  • Calculating TP and FN with Confusion Matrix: The confusion matrix helps determine True Positives (TP) and False Negatives (FN).
  • Manual Recall Calculation: The recall score is calculated manually by dividing TP by the sum of TP and FN.

This comparison highlights how different calculation methods can lead to varying results in evaluating model performance.

    Why does manual calculation differ from confusion matrix output?

    Discrepancies can occur due to implementation details or variable handling differences between manual calculations and built-in functions.

    Which method should I trust for obtaining accurate results?

    Using established library functions like confusion_matrix generally ensures more reliable outcomes compared to manual calculations prone to human error.

    Can discrepancies significantly impact model evaluation?

    Even minor variations in metrics like recall score could influence decisions regarding model effectiveness or task suitability.

    How can I debug issues arising from inconsistent metric calculations?

    Cross-validating results with multiple approaches or seeking peer review can help validate findings effectively amidst such discrepancies.

    Are there common pitfalls leading to incorrect metric assessments?

    Errors often arise from misinterpreting input data structures or overlooking nuances in metric computation logic tailored per task requirements.


    Understanding why discrepancies exist between manually calculating metrics like recall score versus using built-in functions such as confusion_matrix is crucial for accurate model assessment. By comparing these methods systematically and considering factors contributing to result differences; users gain insights into optimizing their evaluation processes effectively. This knowledge empowers continual enhancement of predictive capabilities in machine learning models.

    Leave a Comment